WHO IS NEGLECTFUL?
The cursed Waseem Rizvi writes in his book on page No 58 that
“The Messenger of Allah attacked Banu Mustaliq at a time when they were neglectful watering their animals. The Messenger killed them and the survivors were held captives”.
This is also an absolute lie. Now, I am going to present the facts about it on the strength of references mentioned in Sirat Ibne Hisham.
“This story commences from page No 348 in Sirat Ibne Hisham, Volume Two and ends on page No 353. But nowhere is it mentioned that they were neglectful watering their animals. It was a stream of water where Prophet Muhammad (Peace & blessings be on him) stayed; and its name was Masiria which is situated around Qudaid towards the seashore. The confrontation also took place at the same location”. Let’s consider the fraud and deception of the cursed Waseem Rizvi that as soon as he heard the name of a stream of water, he falsely fabricated the story of watering the animals; and he writes that they all were unaware. In fact, they weren’t unaware at all; instead they all were preparing for war against the Muslims. Now, here I am going to present the story in a nutshell.
Ibne Hisham writes with the reference of Ibne Ishaq. Ibne Ishaq says….
“The Messenger of Allah (Peace & blessings be on him) came to know that Bani Mustalaq had been gathering the people with a view to confronting against the Muslims. Their leader was Haris bin Abu Zarrar who was the father of Hazrat Zubairiyah-the mother of the believers. Therefore, he (Peace & blessings be on him) set out to confront against them and camped at a stream of water whose name was Banam Marisia. Eventually, the confrontation also took place at the same place which led to the blood shedding. Subsequently, Allah, the Almighty, defeated Banu Mustalaq. Some of their fellows were killed and the rest of the men and women were held captives”.
Now, the cursed Waseem Rizvi is asked: who was preparing for confrontation? Wasn’t there a confrontation from both the sides? Then, how were they unaware? Besides, so long as the confiscation of their goods and imprisonment of the people is concerned, it is a rule of confrontation that the conqueror of the fight captures all these things. If Banu Mustalaq had been the conqueror, would they have garlanded the Muslim army? In fact, the literary reading of the cursed Waseem Rizvi is drastically poor as he is not aware of the consequences of wars of the recent past, the ensuing future and the contemporary time. It is very obvious that when two armies fight against each other, the conquering army does imprison the defeated army. The conquering nation takes the defeated nation under its control. Hence, doesn’t the cursed Waseem Rizvi know that the Britishers captured India and, consequently, ruled over the Indians for two hundred years having invoked their personal laws and legislations in India?
Views: 41