It is mentioned in Shrimadralmikiy Ramayan, Sarg No 46, Page No 448, Matbua Geeta Press,Gorakhpur that Ravan addresses Sita as:

“O, beautiful Muskan (Smile), bearing attractive teeth and fascinating eyes luxurious girl! You overpower my heart by your beauty and glory in the same way as a river kidnaps its bank by its water.

Your waist is so slim that it can be enveloped into a fist; your hairs are silky and fascinating. Both breasts are meeting each other. O, beautiful girl! No woman is your replica from the species of Devta, Gandharv, Yax& Kinnar”.

Now, here the cursed Waseem Rizvi has to admit that whether or not the religious scriptures and Dayanand Saraswati impart the sex education to his followers. The cursed Waseem Rizvi himself has to reply to this question.

For instance, if a man suffers from any sex related ailments and, consequently, consults any Sexologist who guides him for his sex problems, can anyone conclude that the doctor imparted the sex education to that patient of sex problems? Women happen to face many genital issues in the run up of pregnancy period. Hence, sometimes the doctor, after the due medical examination, advises the women not to have sexual intercourse with the husbands till the delivery of a baby. So, according to the cursed Waseem Rizvi, can it be concluded that the doctor imparts the sex education to that woman? No, it is never so at all. But a person like the cursed Waseem Rizvi who bears the sexy psychology would definitely conclude that the doctor imparts the sex education to the women.

If there is any medical emergency, we happen to talk about the genital organs and genital relations; but under no circumstances can it be termed as the Sex Education at all. Dr. Muhammad Naeemi writes in his book “The Comparative Study of Islam and Hindu Religions”, Volume Two, Page No 403 with the reference of Manusmriti that “Women don’t consider the face and beauty nor do they consider the equality of age nor beauty or ugliness. Once they happen to gain companionship with a man, they have sexual intercourse with him”.

Dr. Muhammad Naeemi writes in the same book on Page No 556 with the reference of Manusmriti regarding Gandhrva Marriage that “The consent and unity between a boy and a girl based on the choice and pleasure of them is known as Gandharva Marriage. It is meant for the carnal desires and it is very fertile for sexual intercourse.

Dr. Muhammad Naeemi writes in his book on Page No 691 with the reference of Manusmriti that

“When fornication is committed out of any deception or disloyalty, the whole of the wealth is snatched away and the head is branded with an image of a woman’s vagina”.

It is mentioned in the same book on Page No 750 with the reference of Manusmriti that

“Fix an image of a woman’s vagina on the forehead of a person with the help of a hot object of iron who commits the fornication with the wife of his master”.

Some of the above statements have been extracted from the Hindu religious books. The vagina, fornication, sexual intercourse, branding of the image of a woman’s vagina on the forehead, fixation of the image of a woman’s vagina on the forehead with the help of a hot object are mentioned in those books.

I don’t intend at all to criticize the customs, traditions& laws of any religion nor do I mean that all these matters are based on the sex education. I just raise a question to the cursed Waseem Rizvi do the matters mentioned in Manusmriti concern the sex education? In fact, he can’t reply to me at all. He is not fit to answer at all. The cursed Waseem Rizvi writes in his book on Page No 85 a chapter as “Sodomy is lawful with the wife”. He further writes in his book that “Ibne Umar reported that the Messenger has said that sodomy is permitted with the wife in this verse and sodomy is stated in his book as lawful. He quotes the reference from Durre Mansur, Volume One, and Page No 638.

Respected Readers! At the outset, I am going to present the reference from Durre Mansur. It is mentioned in Durre Mansur, Volume One, and Page No 638 that:

’’من طریق یزید بن رومان عن عبیداللہ بن عبداللہ بن عمر ان عبداللہ بن عمر کان لایری باسا ان یاتی الرجل المراۃ فی دبرھا۔‘

Translation: “Yazin been Roman is reported to have been said by Ubaidullah bin Abdullah that Abdullah bin Umar wasn’t aware of any objection if a man enters into the anus of a woman”.

Kindly read this sentence repeatedly. Do you find any name of the Messenger of Allah (Peace & blessings be on him) or do you find any sentence in which Umar says that I don’t see any objection in this act of sodomy? In fact, he has associated this sentence with him. He mentions the sentence KAAN LAAYARI……as had been said by him.

Respected Readers! Let’s enumerate the lies of the cursed Waseem Rizvi well prior to proceeding for its interpretation.

LIE NO 01

“Sodomy is permitted with the wife”.

Explanation: It is prohibited, it is prohibited, it is stringently prohibited. I’ll produce before you the verses of the holy Quran as well as Ahadith to substantiate its prohibition.

LIE NO 02

“When Ibne Umar said”.

Explanation: It is also a blatant lie, It is not said by Ibne Umar; instead it is narrated by Yazid bin Roman to his son Ubaidullah bin Abdullah that Ibne Umar used to say so. It proves that it is not a narration of Ibne Umar.

LIE NO 03

“Messenger permitted sexual intercourse through her anus in this verse”

Explanation: It is a lie, it is a lie and it is a very flagrant lie. It is not permitted by any verse of the holy Quran nor does any Hadith permit for it nor did any Companion consider it as lawful. Now, I am going to present the references of the holy Quran as well as the Hadith in order to bring out the coffin of lies of the cursed Waseem Rizvi very merrily.